Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD): Theory, Example and Demonstration in Agri Analyze tool
This blog explains RCBD design in detail, guides step by step to perform analysis and demonstrates its analysis online using Agri Analyze tool. Link of the MCQ is shared in bottom! (Reading time 15 min)
Introduction
Experimental
design is a systematic approach in scientific research, essential for
investigating relationships among variables. It ensures valid and interpretable
results through randomization, replication and control. Randomization
distributes extraneous variables evenly, reducing bias. Replication increases
reliability and precision by accounting for variability within experimental
units. Control ensures that observed differences are due to the independent
variable. Designs range from simple completely randomized designs to complex
ones like randomized complete block designs, factorial designs and Latin
squares. These designs help isolate variable effects and understand their
interactions. Effective experimental design is crucial for drawing valid
conclusions and advancing scientific knowledge across various fields.
Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD)
Randomized
Complete Block Design (RCBD) is a fundamental experimental design used
extensively in scientific research to control for variability within
experimental units. In RCBD, each block contains all treatments, with random
assignment within blocks, controlling for variability and ensuring
comprehensive treatment comparison. Hence, it is called "Randomized
Complete Block Design." This design reduces experimental error and
enhances the precision of treatment comparisons by accounting for
block-to-block variability. RCBD is particularly useful in experiments with
known or suspected gradients in conditions, such as soil fertility in
agricultural studies. It is essential for drawing valid inferences about
treatment effects while minimizing the influence of extraneous factors.
When RCBD is used?
The
RCBD is employed in agricultural research under specific conditions to achieve
reliable and precise results. Here are scenarios when RCBD is used:
1. Heterogeneous
Experimental Units: When there is
significant variability within the experimental field, such as differences in
soil fertility, moisture, or topography, RCBD helps control this variability by
grouping similar units into blocks.
2. Known
Gradients: When there are known gradients in the
experimental area (e.g., fertility gradients across a field), RCBD is used to
ensure that each treatment is tested across all levels of the gradient,
reducing the impact of these gradients on treatment comparisons.
3. Multiple
Treatments: When comparing multiple treatments
(e.g., different crop varieties, fertilizers, or pest control methods), RCBD
ensures that each treatment is equally represented within each block, allowing
for accurate comparison.
1. Limited
Experimental Units: In cases where the
number of experimental units is limited, RCBD maximizes the use of available
units by reducing experimental error, thus enhancing the precision of the
results.
2. Small-Scale
Trials: For small-scale trials where variability
within the experimental area can significantly impact results, RCBD provides a
robust method to control for this variability.
Assumptions of RCBD
The
RCBD operates under several key assumptions to ensure valid and reliable
results:
1. Homogeneity
within Blocks: The experimental units within each
block are assumed to be homogeneous, meaning they are similar in terms of
characteristics that could affect the response variable (e.g., soil fertility,
moisture levels).
2. Independence
of Observations: Observations from different
experimental units are assumed to be independent of each other. The response of
one unit does not influence the response of another.
3. Additivity
of Effects: The effects of blocks and treatments are
additive, meaning there are no interactions between blocks and treatments.
4. Random
Assignment: Treatments are randomly assigned to
experimental units within each block to ensure unbiased estimates of treatment
effects.
5. Normality:
The response variable for each treatment
is assumed to be normally distributed within each block.
6. Equal
Variance: The variance of the response variable is
assumed to be the same for all treatments within each block.
7. No
Missing Data: It is assumed that there are no
missing data points. Each treatment is represented in every block.
Randomization steps in RCBD
Randomization
in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) is a crucial step to ensure
unbiased allocation of treatments to experimental units within each block. Here
are the detailed steps for randomization in RCBD:
1.
Identify the Treatments: List all the treatments to be tested in the experiment. Let's assume
there are t treatments
2.
Define the Blocks: Identify and define the blocks based on homogeneous characteristics.
Each block will contain all the treatments. Let's assume there are r blocks
(replications).
3.
Assign Treatments Randomly within Each Block: To randomly
assign treatments within each block in an RCBD, list all treatments and use a
randomization method such as random number tables, computer software, or
drawing lots. Document the random allocation for each block to ensure clear and
unbiased treatment distribution across the experimental units.
4.
Record the Assignment: Document the random allocation of treatments for each block to ensure
the layout plan is clear and can be followed accurately during the experiment.
5.
Repeat for All Blocks: Repeat the randomization process for each block until all treatments
have been randomly assigned to plots within every block.
6.
Verify Randomization: Ensure that each treatment appears once in every block and that the
allocation is indeed random. This can be done by checking the documentation or
using software outputs.
7.
Create a Layout Plan: Develop a visual representation or map of the experimental layout
showing the randomized assignment of treatments within each block.
Example of RCBD
Ten
wheat varieties were put under yield trial against local in randomizes block
design with four replications at the Vijapur farm. Observed yield data is given
below.
Genotypes |
Replications |
Total of genotype |
Mean of genotype |
|||
R-1 |
R-2 |
R-3 |
R-4 |
|||
Haura |
148 |
132 |
148 |
132 |
560 |
140 |
HY-12 |
155 |
156 |
157 |
160 |
628 |
157 |
HY-65-4 |
112 |
136 |
126 |
150 |
524 |
131 |
HY-11-6 |
112 |
114 |
100 |
118 |
444 |
111 |
HY-12-5-3 |
124 |
125 |
126 |
125 |
500 |
125 |
HY-5-7-2 |
92 |
94 |
98 |
96 |
380 |
95 |
HY-11-8 |
116 |
124 |
130 |
134 |
504 |
126 |
Kalyan
sona |
115 |
121 |
122 |
126 |
484 |
121 |
Sonalika |
131 |
131 |
132 |
130 |
524 |
131 |
GW-24 |
145 |
149 |
150 |
156 |
600 |
150 |
Rep total |
1250 |
1282 |
1289 |
1327 |
5148 |
|
Conducting
LSD test for multiple mean comparison
1. Arrange
varieties means in descending order, find difference (d) between two
consecutive means and follow procedure given below:
Varieties |
Mean |
HY-12 |
157 |
GW-24 |
150 |
Haura |
140 |
HY-65-4 |
131 |
Sonalika |
131 |
HY-11-8 |
126 |
HY-12-5-3 |
125 |
Kalyan sona |
121 |
HY-11-6 |
111 |
HY-5-7-2 |
95 |
2. Find
difference between two consecutive means
3. d=
157-150 =7. If d >= CD, then both means are significantly different. There is no need to find d between HY-12
and GW-24. If d < CD, then both means are not significantly different OR we
can say both are at par. Here, both varieties are significantly at par.
4. But
d = 157 (HY-12) – 140 (Haura) =17, Here d >= CD, then both means are
significantly different.
5. d
= 150 (GW-24) – 140 (Haura) =10, Here d >= CD, then both means are
significantly different.
6. d
= 140 (Haura) – 131 (HY-65-4) = 9, Here d < CD, then both means are not significantly
different. Same for Sonalika, these varieties are significantly at par.
7. Follow
same procedure to exhaust all means.
8. Final
LSD test for varieties given as under:
Varieties |
Mean |
Group |
HY-12 |
157 |
a |
GW-24 |
150 |
a |
Haura |
140 |
b |
HY-65-4 |
131 |
bc |
Sonalika |
131 |
bc |
HY-11-8 |
126 |
cd |
HY-12-5-3 |
125 |
cd |
Kalyan sona |
121 |
d |
HY-11-6 |
111 |
e |
HY-5-7-2 |
95 |
f |
Steps to perform analysis of RCRD in
Agri Analyze
Step 1: To create a CSV file with columns for Genotype and Yield (Gain).
The link of the entire data set
Step 2: Go with Agri Analyze site. https://agrianalyze.com/Default.aspx
Step
3: Click on ANALYTICAL TOOL
Step
4: Click on DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT
Step
5: Click on RCRD ANALYSIS
Step
6: Click on ONE FACTOR RCRD ANALYSIS
Step
7: Select CSV file.
Step
8: Select treatment, replication and dependent
variable (e.g., Gain).
Step 9: Select a test for
multiple comparisons, such as the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, to
determine significant differences among groups. Same as for Duncan’s New
Multiple Range Test (DNMRT), Tukey’s HSD Test.
Step
10: After submit download analysis report.
Output File Snip
Link of the output file
REFERENCES
Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical
Procedures for Agricultural Research. John wiley & sons. 25-30.
Comments
Post a Comment